Meeting minutes
<axelpolleres> Waiting for Bert to join to hopefully open an alternative Webex...
<Javier> In the worst case, we can use something similar: https://
<Javier> feel free to try my link if you wish, it should work
<axelpolleres> fine, we will resort to jit.si....
On my way..
<axelpolleres> we will take jit.si for today
<axelpolleres> thanks!
<axelpolleres> scribe?
<axelpolleres> stub spec doc on gdrive... https://
Question Axel: How to generate the full document out of the vocubulary sheet on the drive
<axelpolleres> https://
<axelpolleres> PROPOSED: approve minutes from last call https://
<Javier> +1
<axelpolleres> +1
+1
<Fajar> +1
<axelpolleres> bert, did you complete this action? bert to close actions to be closed as per https://
<stefano> I was not there
RESOLUTION: approve minutes from last call https://
<axelpolleres> https://
close ACTION-105
<trackbot> Closed ACTION-105.
<Javier> See the email of Harsh with open/closed actions: https://
<Mark> is webex. not working ?
<Javier> we are using https://
<Javier> we couldn't set up Webex in the beginning, but we can switch nowif needed
close action-102
<trackbot> Closed action-102.
close action-101
<trackbot> Closed action-101.
close action-100
<trackbot> Closed action-100.
Regarding action-98 Process for feedback: Axel added a suggestion to the draft version in the google doc - asking for proposals to extend initial taxonomies by additional items
cloise action-98
close action-09
<trackbot> Closed action-09.
close action-98
<trackbot> Closed action-98.
<axelpolleres> leave ACTION-97 open for the moment, need to discuss with Harsh still.
close action-95
<trackbot> Closed action-95.
close action-96
<trackbot> Closed action-96.
<Bert> Sorry, didn't close those actions in time, but they are closed now.
Action-96: Fajar added the NACE sector.
<trackbot> Notes added to Action-96 Consolidate consent part..
Question: Do we need a subclass NaceSector of Sector?
… Harsh proposed to remove NaceSector and directly use Sector.
… Proposal: have the NACE sectors in the spec, not include all the nace sectors in the dpvcg vocabulary
<Fajar> list of purpose: dpvcg/
Question: The original published NACE list uses skos:broader and skos:narrower, so Fajar created a version that uses rdfs subclasses
Question: (Original RDF version of nace)
… Original RDF is not provided anymore, is only available in web archive
<Mark> I have to drop for another meeting - (Happy PrivMas ☺
Question: Happy PrivMas ;)
<harsh> Hello. Trying to join webex, link says meeting hasn't started yet...
Question: Hi Harsh, we moved over here: https://
<harsh> thanks
<harsh> Cannot hear any audio, apologies
Question: Proposal: For NACE classification - use dpv:Sector (and remove nace sector) and just leave in a few examples.
Axel: How do we mark something as "under discussion"?
… Beneficiary should not be left out, but marked "under discussion"
<harsh> 1) We don't have examples for any other class, so I don't agree with having NACE examples in taxonomy. We can have them in the document.
<harsh> 2) We can mention beneficiary in the document as proposed or under discussion? Or use bibo status to indicate a class is not stable/final ?
ACTION: Fajar to coordinate with Bert and HArsh, where to place the namespace documents, e.g. dpv-nace
<trackbot> Created ACTION-107 - Coordinate with bert and harsh, where to place the namespace documents, e.g. dpv-nace [on Fajar Ekaputra - due 2019-05-30].
ACTION: Fajar,Harsh to Define location for namespace documents
<trackbot> Error finding 'Fajar,Harsh'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://
ACTION: bert to Define location for namespace documents
<trackbot> 'bert' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., bbos, bertv).
ACTION: Bert to Define location for namespace documents
<trackbot> 'Bert' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., bbos, bertv).
ACTION: bbos to Define location for namespace documents
<trackbot> Created ACTION-108 - Define location for namespace documents [on Bert Bos - due 2019-05-30].
<axelpolleres> Harsh, do you remember does the script have a way to display the "comments" column as issues to be discussed in the spec generation?
<harsh> Comments from the spreadsheet or google doc?
ACTION: axel to check with HArsh whether/how the script have a way to display the "comments" column as issues to be discussed in the spec generation?
<harsh> Either way, can try to do that
<trackbot> Error creating an ACTION: could not connect to Tracker. Please mail <sysreq@w3.org> with details about what happened.
<axelpolleres> comments from the spreadsheet
<harsh> Can do
<Javier> Column J in the sheet
<harsh> Would need to edit the script to add comments as issues
ISSUE: ask for specific feedback on (un)ambiguity of the term descriptions
<trackbot> Created ISSUE-21 - Ask for specific feedback on (un)ambiguity of the term descriptions. Please complete additional details at <https://
ACTION: elmar to Review comments on personalDataCategory descriptions and see whether we need to discuss, request any specific comments.. on any of them
<trackbot> Created ACTION-110 - Review comments on personaldatacategory descriptions and see whether we need to discuss, request any specific comments.. on any of them [on Elmar Kiesling - due 2019-05-30].
Axel: close action-94
<trackbot> Closed action-94.
<axelpolleres> Goal for next time would be to - as soon as possible - send around a generated full document for review. Next time discuss the reviews and decide for publication.
<axelpolleres> adjourned
<axelpolleres> next call on June 4th, 16:00