W3C

DPVCG Meeting Call

13 OCT 2021

Attendees

Present
:, beatriz, georg, harsh, julian, paul
Regrets
-
Chair
harsh
Scribe
harsh

Meeting minutes

DPV Personal Data Category naming

see w3c/dpv#27

Changing PersonalDataCategory to PersonalData ⟶ big change, needs to be taken up with all on mailing list

for prefixing or suffixing concepts ; proposal is Historical ⟶ HistoricalData

georg: related to issue regarding whether the naming should also reflect whether something is personal data, after anonymising, etc.

paul: what is the origin of these names?

harsh: EnterPrivacy taxonomy, and in SPECIAL there were separate vocabs for each concept e.g. personal data category

harsh: a better example is perhaps Location as personal data, but also relevant in recipient and data storage where it is a separate concept
… Two options we have: separate vocabularies - to minimise compatibility issues, we can move just the personal data categories; OR add prefix/suffix to data categories

beatriz: both are fine

paul: one single vocab would be preferable

georg: one single vocab is the selling point / attraction for DPV

julian: one view or vocab is preferable
… We have option to prefix PD as a suggestion

georg: Do we limit this to PD or also expand with other requests such as EyeColourDataSensitive?

harsh: only for PD, for sensitive we have subclass
… No objections to prefixing with PD

Should DPV provide Constraints/Permissions/Prohibitions?

harsh: See w3c/dpv#18
… See EBISPOT/DUO

beatriz: would be better to use ODRL since it has rights and constraints handling by design and purpose

harsh: there is value in lightweight concepts, which can be further expressed using ODRL
… We consider this of interest, and needing further thought. Beatriz will be the technical evaluator to express critique.

Personal data characteristics: collection method (direct, inferred), sensitivity, (pseudo-)anonymisation

harsh: Collection method (direct, inferred) → is of interest; propose concepts for review
… Sensitivity - proposal to have this as subclass of PersonaDataCategory and parent class of SpecialCategories

georg: are they the same? see. Rec 10

harsh: they should be different, Sensitive is a larger set, e.g. EDPB considers Location as sensitive but it is not Special
… agreement that Sensitivity can be added to DPV
… Anonymisation and Pseudo-anonymisation (along with levels, methods) are in interest. As in anonymised and pseudo-anonymised data. To provide concepts for review.

Technology / Implementation details e.g. storage mechanism, use of cookies

harsh: Agreement that this is of interest, and should be added
… Proposal is to have a separate concept for technology (or technological implementation) for associating how something else in DPV is implemented e.g. data storage in cloud storage or database

Privacy Policy and related concepts

harsh: see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpvcg/2021Oct/0003.html for sources and SotA
… see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpvcg/2021Oct/0005.html for spreadsheet with concept proposals by Georg
… (shared screen by Georg showing mind map of privacy policy concepts)
… concepts being discussed - publishing data, duration (start and end of effect) can be represented using DCT or DCAT as relevant

georg: how to number/identify specific personal data handling instances in a privacy policy
… We stop the discussion here due to time limits.

Next Meeting

georg: We will meet again on WED OCT-27 13:00 WEST 14:00 CEST
… Discussion will take place asynchronously on the mailing list
elsewhere meanwhile

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 217 (Fri Apr 7 17:23:01 2023 UTC).